Skip to content

Architecture & engineering

Temple plans

Kakatiya shrines are classified by the number of sanctuaries they enclose: ekakuta (one), dwikuta (two), trikuta (three), chatuskuta (four) and panchakuta (five). The Thousand Pillar Temple faces south.

Aerial view of the Ramappa temple complex: a rectangular walled enclosure among green fields, with the main temple on its stepped platform with projecting corners near the centre and smaller shrines within the walls

The Ramappa complex from the air. The main temple's platform, with its many projecting corners, sits within a rectangular walled enclosure.

Photo: Torchtelangana, via Wikimedia Commons · CC BY-SA 4.0

A corner of the Thousand Pillar Temple: a shrine block with moulded walls standing on a broad, multi-tiered stone platform that projects beyond the walls

A shrine block of the Thousand Pillar Temple on its raised platform, which projects beyond the walls in several tiers.

Photo: Ms Sarah Welch, via Wikimedia Commons · CC0

NEntrances on the north, east and south

1 · Ekakuta

An ekakuta has one shrine with a pillared hall in front of it. The Ramappa Temple has one shrine and three entrances to its hall.

Sources: UNESCO dossier 2017Murali Krishna 2024

See the temple from above (satellite view, new tab)

NShivaVishnuSuryaEntrance on the south

3 · Trikuta

A trikuta has three shrines on three sides of one pillared hall. At the Thousand Pillar Temple, Shiva is on the west, Vishnu on the north and Surya on the east, and the temple faces south.

Sources: Rama Rao 1966Murali Krishna 2024

See the temple from above (satellite view, new tab)

N12Hall 1 is the older part. Hall 2 joins the added shrines.

5 · Panchakuta

Erukala Nancharigudi at Ramanujapur began as a trikuta. Builders later added two shrines on the east and west and joined them to a second hall. The source does not give the position of the second hall, so the drawing places it schematically.

Sources: Murali Krishna 2024

Sanctum (garbhagriha)Passage room before the sanctumHall (mandapa), with pillarsEntrance porchPlatform

The drawings are schematic plans seen from above. They show how the parts are arranged, not their measurements.

Sand-box foundations

The Ramappa Temple stands on a sand-box foundation. The builders dug a pit two to three metres deep and filled it with sand. They built a dry-stone retaining wall one to two metres high round the pit and filled it with sand. A second wall, 1.5 metres high, raised the bed further. The sand reached a total depth of about six metres. The nomination dossier says that this confined bed of sand spreads the load of the temple.

Source: UNESCO dossier 2017

The sand box also has a weakness. Engineers from the Regional Engineering College, Warangal, found that the sandstone floor beams resting on the sand had broken. The four main dolerite pillars of the hall have settled as a result.

Source: UNESCO dossier 2017

Materials

A polished black stone pillar inside Ramappa Temple, lathe-turned into rings and carved with bands of small sculptures, beside a shrine doorway with carved dark stone jambs

Inside the mandapa: a pillar of polished black stone, turned into rings and carved with friezes of small sculptures, beside a carved shrine doorway.

Photo: Ms Sarah Welch, via Wikimedia Commons · CC0

Dolerite is the signature material of Kakatiya sculpture. At Ramappa it was used for pillars, door jambs, lintels and the bracket sculptures. The 1900 survey noted at Uparpalle that this fine-grained black stone allows the very finest chiselling, takes a high polish, and is very uniform in colour and grain.

Sources: UNESCO dossier 2017 · ASI 1900

At Ramappa the four main load-bearing pillars of the hall are of dolerite. Granite was used for other columns and beams that carry heavy loads. The body of the temple is pink Chelvai sandstone, which gives it a pinkish colour.

Source: UNESCO dossier 2017

The Ramappa vimana is built of brick light and porous enough to float on water. The dossier gives these bricks a density of 0.85 to 0.90 grams per cubic centimetre. Each brick measures about 14 by 6 by 4 inches and weighs about 3 kilograms. The 1900 survey recorded that the Palampet sikhara was built entirely of brick, moulded to suit the design, with a smaller temple to the north also carrying a brick sikhara.

Sources: ASI 1900 · UNESCO dossier 2017

The bracket sculptures

The madanikas are female bracket sculptures that project from the columns. The Ramappa dossier calls them the most described sculptures of the Kakatiya period. At Ramappa they spring from the shoulders of the dolerite columns to carry the overhanging cornice. The 1900 survey called the sculptured brackets “a marked feature” of the temple.

A single dark stone bracket sculpture of a woman with arms raised overhead, set on a column capital beneath the eave of the Ramappa mandapa

A madanika bracket at Ramappa: a female sculpture in dark polished stone, arms raised, set between the column capital and the eave.

Photo: Varshabhargavi, via Wikimedia Commons · CC BY-SA 3.0

Dark stone bracket sculptures of rearing lion-like beasts standing over small elephants, set on the capitals of sandstone columns beneath the eave of the Ramappa mandapa

Not all the brackets are madanikas. These show rearing lion-like vyalas over small elephants, in dark stone on sandstone column capitals.

Photo: Rangan Datta Wiki, via Wikimedia Commons · CC BY-SA 4.0

The sculptors gave each sculpture a different role, such as dancer, huntress, drummer or a woman garlanding herself. The dossier counts 38 bracket sculptures on the hall, and twelve of them are madanikas. Elsewhere the same dossier gives 40 madanikas and gaja-vyalas, each about six feet tall.

Source: UNESCO dossier 2017

The doors carry Gajalakshmi on their lintels. At Ghanpur, the antarala doorway of the main temple carries Siva Tandava.

Water

The inner face of an embankment at Ramappa Lake, faced with closely set stone blocks laid on a steep slope down to the water, with trees along the top

The water face of the Ramappa Lake embankment, protected by close-set stone pitching.

Photo: Thirumal Prasad Patil, via Wikimedia Commons · CC BY-SA 4.0

Wide view across Pakhal Lake to a forested hill on the far shore, with a small island reflected in the still water

Pakhal Lake, with forested hills along its far shore.

Photo: Luckypreetham, via Wikimedia Commons · CC BY-SA 4.0

The Kakatiyas and their chiefs built tanks so widely that nearly every village had at least one.

Source: Goel et al. 2022

Pakhal Lake, with a dam more than 2,000 yards long holding back nearly thirteen square miles of water, is the largest of these tanks.

Source: Imperial Gazetteer 1909

Rulers and their feudatory chiefs endowed tanks to temples. The endowment inscriptions record the villages granted along with each tank.

Sources: Goel et al. 2022 · Epigraphia Telanganica 2023

Forts and walls

A long sloping stretch of the Warangal Fort wall built of large reddish dressed stone blocks set in stepped layers, beside a road

A stretch of the stone wall of Warangal Fort, built of large dressed blocks set in stepped layers.

Photo: Pinakpani, via Wikimedia Commons · CC BY 4.0

A keerthi thorana gateway at Warangal standing in parkland, with fallen carved stone blocks and column bases piled on the grass in front

A keerthi thorana with fragments of the Swayambhu temple, among them column bases and lintel pieces, lying on the ground in front.

Photo: Rangan Datta Wiki, via Wikimedia Commons · CC BY-SA 4.0

Tradition describes Warangal Fort as two works: an outer mud fort called Bhumikota and an inner stone fort called Kalukota. A wide, deep moat called Parikha encircled the mud rampart. The Kakatiya-period Kridabhiramamu calls that rampart Prakara. The sources disagree about the name Kanchu-kota, 'the bronze fort'. Parabrahma Sastry gives that name to the stone fort itself. M. Rama Rao gives it to a brick enclosure inside the fort, around the royal palace.

Sources: HRIDAY Warangal leaflet · Parabrahma Sastry 1978 · Parabrahma Sastry 1975 (thesis) · Rama Rao 1966

The sources record this as tradition, not as fact established by inscriptions.

The 1900 Archaeological Survey recorded two walls around the fort: an earthen wall and a stone wall. The survey found only four gateways, one each on the north, south, east and west. The survey reported that only the east and west gateways were then in use.

Sources: ASI 1900 · HRIDAY Warangal leaflet · Warangal District Gazetteer 1976

Later sources count eight gateways, four in each wall. Those sources give different numbers of bastions, from 46 to 77. This site uses the numbers of the 1900 survey, because that survey is earlier and more systematic.

The stone wall was built of rough, irregular blocks of black granite. The blocks were laid in layers, with flat and upright blocks in alternate layers. This arrangement balanced the great outward pressure on the wall. A heritage leaflet on Warangal describes this method.

Source: HRIDAY Warangal leaflet